Semi-serious research: 499 profiles, 76 pics (one of white briefs and an erection)

[bayridgebabe]

Originally Posted by takeaseatplease

It would seem that the majority of those users fail the Turing test. Is there some way to determine if they're actual people or just some kind of automated robot program? Even if they can't be stopped, I suppose they serve a purpose, even if it is only humor at the expense of the butchering of the English language.

Or, as they might put it, "im vera nce man, who LOVES COUGAAAAAAAARS so hot be my shugar mami"

The scarier thing is that most of these (SCAMMERS) type like that but so do the illiterate ones. Now that sounds like some of the e-mails I've received

you (takeaseatplease) my dear are a sweetheart

[max_26]

Originally Posted by takeaseatplease

Or, as they might put it, "im vera nce man, who LOVES COUGAAAAAAAARS so hot be my shugar mami"

I am soooooo going to try that out.

[takeaseatplease]

Originally Posted by max_26

I am soooooo going to try that out.

I hear it works like a charm. It's almost like a mystical incantation of loooove.

[surfkitty]

Can you hum a few bars? :0

[sealion]

i'd do this study on women but I don't have the time at the moment hahahahaha

[sonia]

Hmm so its ok to take pot shots at guys who don't have english as their first language? Not very principled is it?

[sealion]

Ok I just did a quick survey of the 130 women who logged in recently (I kind of quasi randomly selected 43-73 age range (not sure why). I surveyed their main profile pick.

21 without picture
1 chest picture
1 eyes only
1 naked boobs
1 eyes crossed out
1 neck and below
1 cartoon figure
1 legs
1 centered around the panties.

I would suspect a higher proportion to have face pictures than in Lunamor's study since I focused on the 130 most recently logged in (hence might be more willing to participate in chats, forums etc.